|
|
||||
|
NATURAL, HEALTHY & SUSTAINABLE BUILDING MATERIALS life cycle analysis |
|||
|
Materials used in construction represent a significant portion of total consumed resources. If these products are toxic, they can effect the health of our indoor environment. If products are not sustainable or renewable, we deplete finite resources. Selecting natural, healthy and sustainable building materials is often about making an informed choice. Choosing "green" products can help improve a building's overall environmental impact. Down to Earth will help identify healthy and sustainable building materials that are appropriate to a specific project. We evaluate projects to find each building material category for which there are environmentally sound alternatives. We then provide product listings for each category identified. Each product recommendation is based on performance requirements and evaluated through life cycle analysis. |
||||
|
Materials are reviewed following life cycle analysis (LCA), which examines the total environmental impact of a product through each stage of its existence. Environmental impacts are assessed from raw materials acquisition, manufacturing processes, packaging, and shipping, through installation, indoor air quality, durability and performance, and end-of-use resource recovery. By evaluating products in this manner, we are able to choose healthy and sustainable building materials minimize detrimental impacts on the environment. Note that life cycle analysis differs from embodied energy in that LCA is qualitative and embodied energy is quantitative. Embodied energy quantifies the total energy required to acquire raw materials, produce a product, and transport to point-of-use. This can be useful when comparing two different materials, however, the validity of the data is highly dependent on the method of evaluation. |
||||
|
|
RAW MATERIALS ACQUISITION
|
|||
|
MANUFACTURING PROCESS
|
|||
|
PACKAGING
SHIPPING
|
|||
|
INSTALLATION
|
|||
|
INDOOR AIR QUALITY & MAINTENANCE
|
|||
|
DURABILITY & PERFORMANCE
|
|||
|
RESOURCE RECOVERY
|
|||
|
COMPANY PROFILE
|
|||
|
IDEALLY THIS FORMS A CLOSED-LOOP RESOURCE MODEL
|
||||
| PRIORITIZING SELECTION CRITERIA |
1. reduced: lower total burden
2. reused: longer lifespan
3. renewable: replenished by natural systems
4. recycled: waste becomes a resource
5. healthy: non-toxic
6. local: less transportation energy
7. durable: longer lifespan
8. post-use: avoid disposal
|
|||
|
||||
|
LINKS TO ONLINE
CATALOGS OF GREEN BUILDING MATERIALS |
||||
|
Build
Recycle.net Building
for Health Materials Center Construction
Resources (London, England) Cool
Roofing Materials Database Eco-House,
Inc. (New Brunswick, Canada) EcoMall Eco
Wise Efficient
Windows Collaborative Energy
Star Products Environmental
Depot Environmental
Home Center Environmental
Home Store EPA
Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines Forest
Certification Resource Center Forest
World Green
Pages Online (Co-Op America) Green
Building Pages GreenProducts GreenSpec
(Environmental Building News Product Directory) Minnesota Building Materials Database Natural
Building Technologies (United Kingdom) Nature
Neutral NSF Originate Real
Goods & GAIAM Recycled
Content Product Database (by California's Integrated Waste Management Board) REDI
Guide Sustainable Sources Guidebook |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Down to Earth Design, inc. ©2000 Sigi Koko & Down to Earth |
||||